Hi
user
Admin Login:
Username:
Password:
Name:
Open collaborations: leadership succession and leadership success
--client
lca
--show
lca2020
--room room_5 15199 --force
Next: 1 Open AND High Performance Computing
show more...
Marks
Author(s):
Ann Smith, Myk Dowling
Location
Room 5
Date
jan Wed 15
Days Raw Files
Start
15:45
First Raw Start
error-in-template
Duration
0:45:0
Offset
None
End
16:30
Last Raw End
Chapters
Total cuts_time
None min.
https://lca2020.linux.org.au/schedule/presentation/77/
raw-playlist
raw-mp4-playlist
encoded-files-playlist
mp4
svg
png
assets
release.pdf
Open_collaborations_leadership_succession_and_leadership_success.json
logs
Admin:
episode
episode list
cut list
raw files day
marks day
marks day
image_files
State:
---------
borked
edit
encode
push to queue
post
richard
review 1
email
review 2
make public
tweet
to-miror
conf
done
Locked:
clear this to unlock
Locked by:
user/process that locked.
Start:
initially scheduled time from master, adjusted to match reality
Duration:
length in hh:mm:ss
Name:
Video Title (shows in video search results)
Emails:
email(s) of the presenter(s)
Released:
has someone authorised pubication
Unknown
Yes
No
Normalise:
Channelcopy:
m=mono, 01=copy left to right, 10=right to left, 00=ignore.
Thumbnail:
filename.png
Description:
markdown
Some projects seem to thrive year after year. Others get forked over and over until potential contributors face nigh-impossible decisions. Some just wither away and never produce a product. What keeps one project alive while others fail to thrive? We look at an open source project in a crisis involving leadership and critical stakeholders, at how the crisis was resolved, and what the world of business research tells us about leadership. We can apply that body of knowledge to make our projects function better.
Comment:
production notes
Rf filename:
root is .../show/dv/location/, example: 2013-03-13/13:13:30.dv
Sequence:
get this:
check and save to add this
Veyepar
Video Eyeball Processor and Review