Author(s):	Serena Chen
Location	Room 7
Date	jan Wed 15	Days Raw Files
Start	11:40	First Raw Start	error-in-template
Duration	0:45:0	Offset	None
End	12:25	Last Raw End
Chapters
Total cuts_time	None min.

https://lca2020.linux.org.au/schedule/presentation/23/
raw-playlist raw-mp4-playlist encoded-files-playlist mp4 svg png

assets release.pdf Like_Share_and_Subscribe_Effective_Communication_of_Security_Advice.json
logs
Admin: episode episode list cut list raw files day marks day marks day image_files

State:	--------- borked edit encode push to queue post richard review 1 email review 2 make public tweet to-miror conf done
Locked:	clear this to unlock
Locked by:	user/process that locked.
Start:	initially scheduled time from master, adjusted to match reality
Duration:	length in hh:mm:ss
Name:	Video Title (shows in video search results)
Emails:	email(s) of the presenter(s)
Released:	Unknown Yes No has someone authorised pubication
Normalise:
Channelcopy:	m=mono, 01=copy left to right, 10=right to left, 00=ignore.
Thumbnail:	filename.png
Description:	For everyday people, security advice is confusing, boring, and ever changing. In response, we’ve developed what essentially are superstitious habits — theatrical, security-flavoured actions that we repeat in hopes of protecting ourselves from “the hackers”. There are two big problems here. First, how do we effectively communicate relevant security advice to non-experts? And secondly, is that advice even persuasive enough to encourage real behavioural change? What kind of advice should we be conveying, and to whom? In this talk we cover why everyday people don’t follow security advice. To help us come up with some solutions, we introduce concepts from behavioural design, psychology and medicine. And I put the theory to the test by trialing some unconventional ways of communicating security to the masses. markdown
Comment:	production notes