Author(s):	Joh Pirie-Clarke
Location	MCC2
Date	feb Fri 01	Days Raw Files
Start	14:15	First Raw Start	error-in-template
Duration	0:45:00	Offset	None
End	15:00	Last Raw End
Chapters
Total cuts_time	None min.

http://lca2013.linux.org.au/schedule/30077/view_talk
raw-playlist raw-mp4-playlist encoded-files-playlist mp4 svg png

assets release.pdf Crazy_quilts_unpicking_patch_deployment_in_au_and_nz.json
logs
Admin: episode episode list cut list raw files day marks day marks day image_files

State:	--------- borked edit encode push to queue post richard review 1 email review 2 make public tweet to-miror conf done
Locked:	clear this to unlock
Locked by:	user/process that locked.
Start:	initially scheduled time from master, adjusted to match reality
Duration:	length in hh:mm:ss
Name:	Video Title (shows in video search results)
Emails:	email(s) of the presenter(s)
Released:	Unknown Yes No has someone authorised pubication
Normalise:
Channelcopy:	m=mono, 01=copy left to right, 10=right to left, 00=ignore.
Thumbnail:	filename.png
Description:	For the last few years, a consortium has been running scans over the entirety of the .nz and .au networks (as defined by the GeoIP database). Focusing on the most popular ports, the results of these scans are a fascinating look into the 'health' -or otherwise- of these countries' networks. Concentrating on the banners and headers from making a connection on TCP ports 22, 23, 80, 53, 443, and 445*, it is possible to fingerprint both the OS and associated patch level of some hosts at a particular point in time. When aggregated, what does this information suggest about current patching strategies in Australasia? Do particular operating systems appear to be easier to keep up to date, or are we failing to maintain them? Finally, excluding harried systems administrators of every type, who might have a vested interest in such a project? *ssh, telnet, http, dns, https and smb/windows shares, respectively. markdown
Comment:	production notes